in religion, but not of religion
Have you had your Damascus road experience so that you are spiritual but not religious, and for whom God talk is optional?
Presbyterians don’t emphasize this so much, but when I was in the Assemblies of God, I heard plenty of sermons that asked, “Have you had your Damascus road experience?” Can you pinpoint a moment in your life in which you could say, “I once was lost, but now am found. Here I am, Lord!” (By the way, the Presbyterians are the bunch I have fallen into!)
The awakening of faith can be a very subjective thing. It can be hard to pinpoint from the outside. For many, it is a gradual growing awareness. That is, if it happens at all. But however it does happen, it is a gift. Sometimes it is a gift delivered in a drastic fashion.
For the Lord to get Paul’s attention, it took something quite drastic! (By the way, I’m using the name “Paul,” since Saul was later known by that name.)
As we begin Acts 9 with his description, we’re actually picking up from a verse in chapter 8. “Saul was ravaging the church by entering house after house; dragging off both men and women, he committed them to prison” (v. 3). And now, with verse 1: “Meanwhile Saul, still breathing threats and murder against the disciples of the Lord.”
There is a sadly comical aspect to this portrayal of Paul. Honestly, doesn’t this guy have anything better to do? He’s pictured like a brute beast, like a wild animal. This guy has some major anger issues! Like the bull in a china shop, he’s been doing some serious damage.
Paul has been hurting and terrorizing those whom, in the future, he will love dearly as his sisters and his brothers. But as I say, that’s in the future!
There is one he is hurting most of all. We’re told, “He fell to the ground and heard a voice saying to him, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ He asked, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ The reply came, ‘I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting’” (vv. 4-5). The risen and ascended Lord passionately identifies with his people. Because of his great love, what hurts them brings him torment.
How different is Paul’s response from that of Ananias in verse 10. Where Paul says, “Who are you, Lord?” Ananias says, “Here I am, Lord.”
It isn’t that Paul doesn’t understand the faith. He is very well versed. Later in Acts, he says that he has “belonged to the strictest sect of our religion and lived as a Pharisee” (26:5). He knows this stuff backwards and forwards! He has the data, but he lacks the experience. That is, he lacks the experience of God’s love.
For me, that’s something I really value from my time with the Assemblies of God. For someone who lived too much in his head, the Pentecostals were a needed corrective.
At an interim ministry training event, a video was presented of the late Edwin Friedman, who was a rabbi and a therapist. In the video, he is commenting on the fallacy of expertise. He is talking about our emphasis on information and technique. Or perhaps I should say the overemphasis on information and technique—the overemphasis on experts. It’s possible to be paralyzed by continuously gathering information before we take any meaningful action. Sometimes we need to learn to trust ourselves.
[words of wisdom from the late great Neil Peart—he was the drummer with Rush, if you didn’t know]
Friedman speaks of the pursuit of data as a form of substance abuse. I had never thought of it that way. Too often, I have greatly abused that substance! It can have the downside of making one indecisive.
Data and experience can be phrased, for lack of better terms, as head knowledge and heart knowledge, or spirit knowledge.
Graham Standish served as a Presbyterian pastor for many years. He is now the executive director of a spiritual counseling center. He published an article called “Shepherding SBNR Sheep: How to Create a Church for the Spiritual but Not Religious.”
For devoted churchgoers, “spiritual but not religious” is often seen as those unwilling to make a commitment. It actually has many connotations, clearly, some more positive than others. Those who identify themselves that way often speak of their distrust of the church, of institutionalized religion, and so on. Some perceive a lack of authenticity. Some look at the church and see a bunch of phonies. To what extent that perception meets reality is a different discussion.
Standish begins his article with a sort of confession. Speaking of the time he was a pastor, he said, “I privately classify myself as being ‘spiritual but not religious’ (SBNR). I know it doesn’t make sense, but somehow it feels right. No matter how long I’ve been the pastor of a church, I’ve always been more ‘in’ religion than ‘of’ religion.” I imagine he would still classify himself as such.
It looks like he’s using the word “religion” to mean the data it contains. He’s using it to express doctrinal content. There’s nothing wrong with doctrine, in and of itself. It’s necessary; it’s simply a body of teachings. But if doctrine is separated from a loving experience of God, it can become deceptive and even dangerous.
I’ve never really considered myself to be religious. I guess that’s a quality I share with our SBNR friends. To me, being called “religious” is not necessarily a compliment. In his zeal to imprison members of the early church, Paul is definitely religious.
Those who are in religion, but not of religion, “want to experience what’s true rather than be told what is true.” Standish talks about one of his parishioners who said, “Most churches tell you what to think. [Our church] encourages you to think.”
I should warn you. When we encourage others to think, we may hear some stuff we would rather not hear. In today’s passage, there are two fellows who hear stuff they don’t want to hear. There’s Paul, hearing how he’s been horribly wrong, and he’s been persecuting his Lord. And then there’s Ananias, who hears that it’s his job to welcome Paul. (“Lord, you do know that he’s done some really bad stuff?”)
Standish addresses something we’re familiar with: asking people certain questions in order to join the church, “such as ‘Do you accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and savior?’ There’s nothing wrong with expecting this, although it puts the SBNR in a quandary: do I say ‘yes,’ even if I don’t know quite what that means, or do I wait till I know what it means? And what if I never know what that means?” He says that “healthy relationships lead more people to an experience of the holy than does rational theologizing.”
Trying to convince people into faith by using a line of reasoning is often not the best approach. And yes, arguing with, and shaming people doesn’t work so well in demonstrating the love of Jesus. In our scripture, Ananias says, “Brother Saul, the Lord Jesus, who appeared to you on your way here, has sent me so that you may regain your sight and be filled with the Holy Spirit” (v. 17). Vision and the Spirit go together.
Look at how our passage ends. “For several days he was with the disciples in Damascus, and immediately he began to proclaim Jesus in the synagogues, saying, ‘He is the Son of God’” (vv. 19-20). So not only is Paul’s sight restored—not only do the blinders come off—but Paul finds his voice. Paul, in effect, joins those who are in religion, but not of religion. That’s what happens when we experience what the data is about.
I want to mention one more thing that’s in the article. It deals with how open we are to those unfamiliar with our language, our jargon. We should realize “that while Christian language and [expressions] help those within a religious tradition to speak a common language of faith, that…language also creates a barrier” for those who don’t understand it. “In effect, it helps us if we are willing learn the language of other faiths, and to learn how to translate certain concepts into our own language.”
When I was in seminary, I had Clinical Pastoral Education (CPE). What that often entails is a student chaplaincy at a hospital, which is what I did. One of the things our supervisor would often ask of us would be to express our faith without using “God talk.” That is, don’t use religious words. When you’re in a hospital, you’re dealing with the entire public, people from all backgrounds.
Another way of looking at it would be: can you talk about faith by focusing on the experience, rather than the data?
On the matter of God talk, I have a little story of my own. It deals with an invitation my wife Banu and I received to stay a couple of days at a camp and conference center about an hour’s drive east of Pittsburgh. We were asked to do some workshops while there.
During one session, I issued that challenge to the folks at camp: describe your faith without using God talk. For instance, what does “Jesus saves” mean?
Some of them gladly welcomed the test and gave it a good “faith” shot! For others—not so much. And when I started pushing them on it, some got irritated; it was even written on their faces. Some of them let me know their displeasure. They were not happy with me.
I observed how reaching out to those outside the four walls might mean learning a different language. I don’t know if they didn’t believe me or just didn’t care. It does require change. Do you know what we call something that doesn’t change? Dead. Life, by its very nature (even at the chemical level), requires change.
My guess would be they just wanted to have a nice, relaxing weekend with their friends. They didn’t need to be given this bit of uncomfortable work. In my defense, this little exercise lasted maybe twenty minutes, but that was enough to tick them off.
(There is a nice postscript to this story. That night, they broke out the board games. Even the folks who got annoyed with me were happy when I joined in. Playing games can be incredibly therapeutic!)
How can we talk about our own experience? How can we tell our story? We all have them, and none of them are any less valid than those of others.
The poster boy for a story of willingness to change is Saul, later known as Paul. His decision to embrace change was a literal turn from death, at least, the death of others. Verse 19 says, “For several days he was with the disciples in Damascus.” These were the same people for which he begged permission to place under arrest and drag back to Jerusalem (where they would not be treated like honored guests).
We could make the argument that Paul himself was on the road to death. Be careful with whom you ally yourself. Choose life or choose death: blessing or curse.
Still, back to my previous question. How about our experience? Are we in religion? Are we of religion? Are there elements of both? As I said earlier, can we talk about faith without using God talk?
Here are questions that go a bit deeper. How are we when it comes to letting God work through us? How are we at being a vessel of the Spirit?
Ananias laid hands on him and prayed. “And immediately something like scales fell from his eyes, and his sight was restored. Then he got up and was baptized, and after taking some food, he regained his strength” (vv. 18-19).
Let us eat the food given by God which strengthens us on the way.